Avoiding news hallucinations
I want to make sure I don’t provide any incorrect news details. I can offer options like writing a brief summary, a full article, social media post, or translating information. It’s good to ask the user for a source link for verification. I can also create a draft quickly without specific dates to minimize risks. Using generic information is safer, attributing uncertainty in timelines when needed to avoid inaccuracies.Writing a neutral update
I want to create a neutral quick update based on the statement about a player’s partial return to training being a positive sign, while noting that the exact return timeline still requires observation and medical assessment. I'll give a short [[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot;快讯稿[[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot; and ask if the user wants more information. I can offer options in various tones, like news, long-form, social media posts, or title combinations. It's important to keep it concise and clear, then ask what they need next.
要不要我把它整理成一条快讯稿?先给你一版简洁稿:
\n
拜仁主帅孔帕尼表示,穆西亚拉已回到球队训练中。孔帕尼称,能重返训练本身就是积极信号,但具体复出时间仍需根据训练反应与医疗评估决定。
你希望我:
\n
\n
\n